* Cleanup not in k-sigs members OWNERS
Signed-off-by: ChengHao Yang <17496418+tico88612@users.noreply.github.com>
* Cleanup inactive members on Kubespray
Signed-off-by: ChengHao Yang <17496418+tico88612@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: ChengHao Yang <17496418+tico88612@users.noreply.github.com>
* [kubernetes] Support Kubernetes v1.32.0
* add workaround for RHEL8
Signed-off-by: Kay Yan <kay.yan@daocloud.io>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kay Yan <kay.yan@daocloud.io>
Co-authored-by: Mohamed Zaian <mohamedzaian@gmail.com>
This is handy when some component releases is buggy (missing file at the
download links) to not block everything else.
Move the filtering up the stack so we don't have to do it multiples
times.
Gvisor releases, besides only being tags, have some particularities:
- they are of the form yyyymmdd.p -> this get interpreted as a yaml
float, so we need to explicitely convert to string to make it work.
- there is no semver-like attached to the version numbers, but the API
(= OCI container runtime interface) is expected to be stable (see
linked discussion)
- some older tags don't have hashs for some archs
Link: https://groups.google.com/g/gvisor-users/c/SxMeHt0Yb6Y/m/Xtv7seULCAAJ
Gvisor is the only one of our deployed components which use tags instead
of proper releases. So the tags scraping support will, for now, cater to
gvisor particularities, notably in the tag name format and the fact that
some older releases don't have the same URL scheme.
Containerd use the same repository for releases of it's gRPC API (which
we are not interested in).
Conveniently, those releases have tags which are not valid version
number (being prefixed with 'api/').
This could also be potentially useful for similar cases.
The risk of missing releases because of this are low, since it would
require that a project issue a new release with an invalid format, then
switch back to the previous format (or we miss the fact it's not
updating for a long period of time).
The Github graphQL API needs IDs for querying a variable array of
repository.
Use a dict for components instead of an array of url and record the
corresponding node ID for each component (there are duplicates because
some binaries are provided by the same project/repository).
* Add `manual` option in the `external_cloud_provider` value
Signed-off-by: ChengHao Yang <17496418+tico88612@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update external cloud provider description in roles & sample inventory
Signed-off-by: ChengHao Yang <17496418+tico88612@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: ChengHao Yang <17496418+tico88612@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds the ability to configure the Kubernetes API server with a structured authorization configuration file.
Structured AuthorizationConfiguration is a new feature in Kubernetes v1.29+ (GA in v1.32) that configures the API server's authorization modes with a structured configuration file.
AuthorizationConfiguration files offer features not available with the `--authorization-mode` flag, although Kubespray supports both methods and authorization-mode remains the default for now.
Note: Because the `--authorization-config` and `--authorization-mode` flags are mutually exclusive, the `authorization_modes` ansible variable is ignored when `kube_apiserver_use_authorization_config_file` is set to true. The two features cannot be used at the same time.
Docs: https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/authorization/#configuring-the-api-server-using-an-authorization-config-file
Blog + Examples: https://kubernetes.io/blog/2024/04/26/multi-webhook-and-modular-authorization-made-much-easier/
KEP: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-auth/3221-structured-authorization-configuration
I tested this all the way back to k8s v1.29 when AuthorizationConfiguration was first introduced as an alpha feature, although v1.29 required some additional workarounds with `kubeadm_patches`, which I included in example comments.
I also included some example comments with CEL expressions that allowed me to configure webhook authorizers without hitting kubeadm 1.29+ issues that block cluster creation and upgrades such as this one: https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack/issues/2575.
My workaround configures the webhook to ignore requests from kubeadm and system components, which prevents fatal errors from webhooks that are not available yet, and should be authorized by Node or RBAC anyway.
Kubernetes Prow Robot
Max Gautier
ChengHao Yang
Kay Yan
Bas
Christian Kröger
Fredrik Liv
kyrie
Chad Swenson
Noam
Mohamed Omar Zaian
Antoine Legrand